|
Groundhog
Studio -
Page 2
Cables & Connectors
 |
Installing cables
is probably one of the most crucial operations you'll face
when
building a studio. All your good musical work will have to pulse
through
these copper arteries, and having to track down and repair faulty
cabling later is a
royal
pain.
I use unbalanced cables for all but the
microphone connections, i.e. one "hot" wire and one shield/ground
wire per cable. The pros & cons of unbalanced vs balanced have been
discussed extensively elsewhere, hence for further reference check out
various forums
at the ever-helpful Sound On Sound
site. |
| Optimistically, I had salvaged the entire cable loom
from
my previous studio. And as luck would have it, the crucial dimensions
of Groundhog Studio were about the same
as the previous ones. Phew! The opportunity
of weeding out some ageing cables as well as re-arranging some
patchbay
assignments wasn't missed, though.
A word on patch bays - there are those
bays with jack connectors at the front AND rear, or those with sockets
at the front and hardwired connections to them from the rear. Of the
two,
I infinitely prefer the latter, despite the flexibility the former
brings.
Whatever you do, dust / grime / spider eggs will always find its way
into
the jack sockets, and twice as many sockets (i.e. front and rear) will
double the potential for faulty connections. Also, connections at the
rear
are harder to clean. Believe me, a good hardwired connection, in the
midst
of all the jack connections one is forced to live with, is a
full-frontal blessing! I'd much rather take
the whole patchbay down to re-solder connections for new
equipment.
Also, semi-balanced connections (i.e.
those where you rely on a signal path that is broken / closed when
plugging
in / unplugging an other jack plug, like an insert point) are not for
the
faint-hearted. If the connection is not frequently in use, dirt
deposited
over months will guarantee a poor, crackly contact
when that socket is eventually pushed into service. I had some
semi-balanced
connections
in my previous studio, and ended up having to make short patch leads to
bridge them for the above reasons. If in doubt - keep it simple!
And while on the subject of connections
- the only genuinely useful tool I have found to maintain /
re-establish
good connections between plugs and sockets is the contact spray called
DEOXit D5 made by Caig. It's not
cheap
(about £12 per can), but provided you spray some on a piece of
cloth
or Q-Tip and wipe the contacts (as opposed to just spraying it
indiscriminately
straight from the can) it should last a jolly long time. Even then, I
found
that contacts will start to go wonky after about 2 to 3 months - time
to
re-apply the D5. Do not, repeat DO NOT use common-and-garden contact
spray
from Maplins etc. - it does more harm than good. Also, do not apply D5
to plastic film moving contacts, as found in faders, pots etc. Caig do
a special spray for those.
|
Patchbay with cable loom only
|
Trunking installed
|
| The
pictures above
show cable looms before and after trunking. Needless to say, one should
always install larger trunking than presently required, since more
cable
is bound to join the existing band in years to come. I run MIDI cables
quite happily alongside audio, but have separate trunking for mains
cable,
at least 10 cm away from audio / MIDI runs. If the two need to cross,
it
should be at right angles to avoid induced mains hum.
Finally, two tips I find useful for a tidier
appearance. Hand-written labels on patchbays / mixer channels etc. are
ok, but fade after a while. I've snapped up a Brother label printer for
well under £20, and found it exceedingly handy for most labelling
tasks in the studio. It also lends a more professional appearance to
the
studio, so it's money well spent.
Secondly, one of many solutions for those
awkward jobs of securing cables beneath a desk, shelf, or any other
wooden
item: wrap a cable tie around the cable(s), trim off the tag to leave
a few cm standing, and then whack a staple through (or across) the tag
into the wood with a staple gun. Nothing feels better than slamming
that
staple home whilst shouting at the unruly bunch of cables, "stay, you
bas*ards!".
The Brother labelling machine |
Stay!
|
|
| Equipment Placement
Where
to place your
equipment and connection points is of course highly subjective, and
depends
amongst other things on how you're used to working, and what
instruments
you record. One factor will be common to all recording musicians,
though
- ergonomics.
I'm sure I'm not the only studio owner
who has woken up with a sore back / neck / wrist on many mornings.
Although
it should be perfectly obvious where to position one's equipment,
practical
and spatial constraints tend to get in the way. Keyboards and mixing
desks
usually find a comfortable position by themselves, perhaps because they
are the main items in most studios and hence got top priority during
the
planning stages.
For me, effect processors have been the
main culprits in the past. They have the uncanny tendency to multiply,
and spread out horizontally, or in my case vertically, along the studio
walls. As a guitarist by choice, I used to find myself with guitar on
lap,
bending down to almost mains socket level (guitar crushing rib case in
the process) to tweak the hobbit-sized buttons of some effects unit
near
the bottom of my FX trolley - only to find that I wasn't able to hear
the
adjustments at all after sitting up, due to the gallons of blood
draining
from my head. Not to mention the state of my back the following day...
Lesson learned. The brief for Groundhog
Studio was to have the most commonly used effects units at eye level,
and
connection points to the start of the most frequently used processing
chains
within easy reach.
As can be seen in the photos below, this
meant building a mini rack above the central shelf, to house my Alesis
and Digitech multi FX unit (with one slot spare for future expansion
[now filled by MPX550]).
It also meant building a customized 45 degree mounting base for the
black
sheep of the processor family, the Line 6 Pod. Much as I love its
sounds,
this one had been bamboozling me for months regarding placement,
because
of its awkward shape. Yes, the Pro version is rack mountable, but I
find
the price penalty prohibitive. As can be seen below, the wooden base
has holes
to let all cables (audio and power) disappear through, and retains the
Pod with two doweling pins that fit into the holes in its back.
|
On shelf: mini rack for multi FX units (right) and
base for
Line 6 Pod |
Beneath main desk: trolley for dynamic processors
and less commonly
used FXs (right), and connection points for Joe Meek pre amp and Line 6
Pod, plus one spare (left) |
| As a guitarist, most of the time my starting
point in the recording chain is either the Joe
Meek pre amp (acoustic guitar), or the Line
6 Pod (electric guitar). Hence it made sense to build and install a
little satellite connection point for these two units, far enough away
from other equipment to prevent cables dangling over faders or buttons.
Compromises are still inevitable. In my
case, I placed the dynamic processors and some infrequently used effect
units in the FX trolley beneath the main desk, since they tend to be
used
mostly during mixing, and settings remain largely unaltered.
Time (and the state of my back) will tell
whether the new layout yields the hoped-for ergonomic improvements. At
least I can say I've tried.
|

Final Verdict
Groundhog
Studio took
2 months to complete, including decorating and carpeting. Compared to
previous
studios I've owned, this one is more spacious, which should make it
more
pleasant to work in. I'm very pleased with the acoustics of it so far,
and re-arranging some equipment placement has certainly helped to make
working there more fun.
Happy? Absolutely! Apart from the fact
that I'd like a Line 6 Bass Pod, an Antares Autotune, a valve mike ...
but that's another story. |
Keyboard rack with sampler and synths
|

Space at last for 5 years' SOS mags
|

 |
To
hear the music
of
Blue Flux,
|
|
Contact Blue Flux
HOME
Copyright Enthalpy Publishing 2006
|